Key result
Environmental sampling at a live goat market detected FMDV RNA in 4.1% (9/217) and PPRV RNA in 60.8% (132/217) of samples, demonstrating its potential for targeted disease surveillance.
Why the study?
Because animals from diverse sources mix in livestock markets before redistribution, markets provide an opportunity for targeted pathogen surveillance using environmental sampling.
Can environmental sampling detect circulating FMDV and PPRV in a live goat market?
Cross-Sectional (n=217)
No
Can environmental sampling detect circulating FMDV and PPRV in a live goat market?
Non-invasive environmental sampling can effectively detect the circulation of high-priority livestock diseases like FMDV and PPRV at live animal markets.
Supports environmental sampling for livestock virus surveillance at markets; leaves open its utility for guiding interventions.
Livestock markets are considered vital parts of the agricultural economy, particularly in developing countries where livestock keeping contributes to both food security and economic stability. Animals from diverse sources are moved to markets, they mix while they are there and are subsequently redistributed over wide geographic areas. Consequently, markets provide an opportunity for targeted surveillance for circulating pathogens. This study investigated the use of environmental sampling at a live goat market in Nepal for the detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) and peste des petits ruminants virus (PPRV), both of which are endemic. Five visits to the market were carried out between November 2016 and April 2018, with FMDV RNA detected on four visits and PPRV RNA detected on all five visits. Overall, 4.1% of samples (nine out of 217) were positive for FMDV RNA and 60.8% (132 out of 217) were positive for PPRV RNA, though the proportion of positive samples varied amongst visits. These results demonstrate that non-invasive, environmental sampling methods have the potential to be used to detect circulation of high priority livestock diseases at a live animal market and, hence, to contribute to their surveillance and control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colenutt et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) and peste des petits ruminants virus (PPRV) (n=217). Environmental sampling was evaluated on Detection of FMDV RNA and PPRV RNA. Environmental sampling at a live goat market detected FMDV RNA in 4.1% (9/217) and PPRV RNA in 60.8% (132/217) of samples, demonstrating its potential for targeted disease surveillance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: