Though an adequate understanding of content is a natural prerequisite of teaching (Carlsen in Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30:471–481, 1993 CarlsenWSTeacher knowledge and discourse control: Quantitative evidence from novice biology teachers’ classroomsJournal of Research in Science Teaching19933047148110.1002/tea.3660300506[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), teachers also need to be able to interpret content in ways that facilitate student learning. How to best support novice teachers in developing and refining their content knowledge for teaching is a crucial and ongoing question for preservice teacher educators. Recently, video clubs are being explored as potential contexts for teacher learning (Barnhart & van Es in Teaching and Teacher Education 45:83–93, 2015 BarnhartTEsEALearning to analyze teaching: Developing pre-service science teachers’ abilities to notice, analyze and respond to student thinkingTeaching and Teacher Education201545839310.1016/j.tate.2014.09.005[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]; Sherin & Han in Teaching and Teacher Education 20:163–183, 2004 SherinMGLinsenmeierKPause, rewind, reflect: Video clubs throw open the classroom doorsJournal of Staff Development20113253841 [Google Scholar]). We hypothesized that pairing video clubs with student teaching experiences would provide a forum for preservice teachers to discuss issues relevant to their professional trajectory through exposure to models of peer teaching and opportunities to reflect on practice. In this study, we explored how secondary science preservice teachers used video club to restructure their overall science knowledge into science knowledge for teaching. Our findings suggest that video clubs allowed preservice teachers to access and leverage student thinking and instructional resources to deepen their understanding of science content and trajectories for science learning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: