Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An awareness of the mental lives of nonhuman animals may raise ethical concern for them and, as a consequence, for their natural habitats. This was explored in a recent study at a Midwestern university. Students attended either an animal-focused or a human-focused introductory psychology course. Students in the animal-focused course reported an increase in proanimal attitudes after the course, whereas, the attitudes of their human-focused cohorts actually decreased. Additionally, students in the animal-focused course reported an increase in concern for animals' natural habitats. Comparative psychology may be a powerful component of a complete environmental education curriculum.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Helton et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: