Key result
Constant heart rate exercise fails to consistently elicit a vigorous VO2 response.
Why the study?
Metabolic demands, power output adjustments, and perceptual responses during constant heart rate exercise within the vigorous intensity range had not been fully quantified in women.
Does constant heart rate exercise at vigorous intensities consistently elicit a desired metabolic stimulus in women?
RCT (n=12)
Randomly ordered
Does constant heart rate exercise at vigorous intensities consistently elicit a desired metabolic stimulus in women?
p-value: p=< 0.05
Prescribing exercise based on a constant percentage of peak heart rate does not consistently achieve the desired metabolic intensity (V̇O2) for vigorous exercise in women.
Constant HR prescription may miss vigorous VO2 targets in women; leaves open need for VO2-guided alternatives in future trials.
PURPOSE: This study quantified the metabolic demands (oxygen uptake (V̇O 2 )), power output adjustments, changes in the V̇O 2 /power output ratio, and perceptual responses (rating of perceived exertion (RPE)) during constant heart rate (HR) exercise performed within the vigorous intensity range (77%-95% HR peak ). METHODS: Twelve women (mean ± SD age, 22 ± 4 yr) performed a graded exercise test to exhaustion to determine peak parameters, and three randomly ordered, constant HR trials to exhaustion or for 60 min at the lower (HR L = 77% HR peak ), middle (HR M = 86% HR peak ), and higher (HR H = 95% HR peak ) end of the vigorous intensity range. Time course of changes and patterns of responses were examined for V̇O 2 , power output, V̇O 2 /power output, and RPE for the composite and for each subject. RESULTS: Across the HR L (time to exhaustion ( Tlim ) = 56.3 ± 9.9 min), HR M (51.8 ± 13.5 min), and HR H (27.2 ± 17.7 min) trials, V̇O 2 and power output decreased quadratically ( P < 0.05) relative to the initial value from 10% to 100% of Tlim , whereas the V̇O 2 /power output increased quadratically from 20% to 100% Tlim , and RPE increased linearly from 50% to 100% Tlim . The V̇O 2 and RPE, collapsed across time, for HR L (54.3% ± 3.3% V̇O 2peak , 11 ± 1.5 RPE) were lower than HR M (64.9% ± 4.5% V̇O 2peak , 14 ± 1.7 RPE), and both were lower than HR H (80.1% ± 4.1% V̇O 2peak , 17 ± 1.4 RPE). None of the 12 subjects at HR L , 6 at HR M , and 7 at HR H were within the vigorous V̇O 2 range. CONCLUSIONS: The HR L was not sufficient to meet the desired metabolic intensity for vigorous exercise, whereas the middle to higher end of the range elicited a V̇O 2 within the prescribed range of only ~50%-60% of the subjects. This study indicated that exercise held constant at a percentage of HR peak cannot consistently be used to prescribe a desired metabolic stimulus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gustave et al. (2024) reported an RCT. Constant heart rate exercise at vigorous intensities vs. Within-subject comparison across intensities was evaluated on Metabolic demands (VO2), power output adjustments, VO2/power output ratio, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) (p=< 0.05). Constant heart rate exercise at 77%-95% HR peak failed to consistently elicit a vigorous VO2 response, with 0 of 12 subjects at 77% HR peak reaching the desired metabolic intensity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: