Key result
A single ventricular premature beat during sinus rhythm induced tachycardia more frequently in AVRT than AVNRT, and terminated it more often.
Why the study?
Differential diagnosis of SVT involves pacing maneuvers, but the incidence and mechanism of a single VPB on initiation and termination of AVNRT versus AVRT required evaluation.
Does a single ventricular premature beat differentially initiate and terminate AVRT compared to AVNRT?
Cross-Sectional (n=337)
Does a single ventricular premature beat differentially initiate and terminate AVRT compared to AVNRT?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A single ventricular premature beat commonly terminates AVRT but rarely AVNRT, which can aid in the noninvasive differential diagnosis of SVT.
BACKGROUND: The differential diagnosis of a supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is accomplished using a number of pacing maneuvers. The incidence and mechanism of a single ventricular premature beat (VPB) on initiation and termination of tachycardia were evaluated during programmed electrical stimulation (PES) of the heart in patients with the two most common regular SVTs: atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and orthodromic atrioventricular tachycardia (AVRT). METHODS: Three hundred and thirty-seven consecutive patients aged above 18 years with an inducible sustained AVNRT or AVRT were prospectively enrolled. Patients with more than one tachyarrhythmia mechanism were excluded. Two hundred and seventeen patients (64.4%) had typical slow/fast AVNRT and 120 (35.6%) had an orthodromic AVRT using a rapidly conducting accessory pathway for V-A conduction. In this cross-sectional study, we specifically report the analysis of tachycardia induction and termination by a single VPB. RESULTS: Tachycardia induction with a single VPB during sinus rhythm was seen in 7 of 120 AVRT and in only one of the 217 patients with AVNRT, (5.8% vs. 0.3%, p < 0.05). When a single VPB was delivered during basic ventricular pacing these values were 28% versus 4%, respectively, (p < 0.001). Termination of tachycardia by a single VPB was observed in nine (4.1%) patients with AVNRT and in 57 (47.5%) with AVRT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Initiation of SVT by a single VPB during sinus rhythm was uncommon and favored AVRT. Termination of SVT by a single VPB was commonly seen in AVRT but rarely in AVNRT. These findings can be of help when interpreting a noninvasive arrhythmia event recording.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guerra et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Supraventricular tachycardia (AVNRT or AVRT) (n=337). Orthodromic atrioventricular tachycardia (AVRT) vs. Atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) was evaluated on Tachycardia induction with a single ventricular premature beat during sinus rhythm (p=<0.05). A single ventricular premature beat during sinus rhythm induced tachycardia more frequently in AVRT than AVNRT, and terminated it more often.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: