Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Electrochemical CO2 reduction to formate provides a prospective avenue to produce more valuable products. Compared to pure Bi and Cu, the Bi–Cu (2:1) bimetallic catalyst optimizes the interfacial electronic structure through the electronic interaction between Bi and Cu. The Bi–Cu (2:1) catalyst exhibits a high faradaic efficiency of 94.1% at −1.0 V vs RHE, high faradaic efficiency (>90%) toward formate in a wide potential window (500 mV), and long-term stability of 20 h. The electrocatalytic mechanism is identified by combining in situ FT-IR and DFT calculations, which demonstrates that formate prefers to be formed through the HCOO* pathway. High faradaic efficiency in a wide potential window can be ascribed to stable active sites and the decreased energy barrier in HCOO* and formate. This study further provides inspirations for promoting the electrocatalytic selectivity of bimetallic catalysts through effective interfacial electronic modulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: