PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Journal of Environmental Engineering (Transactions of AIJ)0 citationsOpen Access

A Study on the Comfort and Energy Effectiveness of Passive Design Method (Part 2) : Case Studies Using Office Building Model

KSKentaro SugaRORyozo OOKA

Key Points

  • The aim is to quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of passive design strategies in office buildings.
  • Annual energy consumption and spatial thermal autonomy used as performance metrics.
  • Internal heat gains from lighting, equipment, and occupant density varied as analysis parameters.
  • SHAP-based feature importance is used for global sensitivity analysis.
  • Dominant factors affecting energy consumption and spatial thermal autonomy differ significantly.
  • Lower internal loads increase the importance of passive design strategies.
  • Findings emphasize the need to consider varying internal conditions in design evaluations.

Abstract

This study extends previous residential analysis to office buildings and aims to quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of passive design strategies. As in the prior study, annual energy consumption and Spatial Thermal Autonomy (sTA) are used as performance metrics. Because internal heat gains in offices are larger and more variable, lighting, equipment, and occupant density are systematically varied as analysis parameters. To capture nonlinearities and interactions among design factors, SHAP-based feature importance is introduced for global sensitivity analysis. Results show that dominant factors differ between energy and sTA and that lower internal loads increase the relative importance of passive design.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Suga et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc3d7dee9eb8c0dce55dehttps://doi.org/10.3130/aije.91.316
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper