Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives: Semi-automated lesion delineation in FDG-PET/CT is sensitive to the maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) threshold used, but its effect on quantitative outputs and image-quality surrogates is not standardised. We compared commonly used thresholds to identify a practical setting for workstation-based SUVmax-threshold segmentation in syngo.via, within a PERCIST-consistent clinical workflow. Material and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed FDG-PET/CT scans from 37 women with metastatic breast cancer, each with a single metastatic lesion. Lesions were contoured in syngo.via using fixed isocontours at 20%, 30%, 40% and 50% of lesion SUVmax. For each threshold, we calculated SUVmean, metabolic tumour volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Medians and percentage changes were summarised, and trends were visualised with line charts. Differences across thresholds were assessed using Friedman tests; associations between metrics were examined with Spearman correlation. Results: Increasing the threshold from 20% to 50% increased median SUVmean by 52% (3.35 to 5.09), SNR by 59% (52.00 to 82.64), and CNR by 62% (48.25 to 78.09), while reducing MTV by 81% (4.51 to 0.84 cm 3 ) and TLG by 69% (14.35 to 4.49) (all p <0.001). SUVmean, SNR, and CNR were strongly positively correlated (ρ>0.9), whereas MTV and TLG were strongly negatively correlated (ρ<−0.9) as the threshold increased. The 40% threshold provided a workable middle ground, improving conspicuity without an excessive loss of volumetric burden. Conclusion: A 40% SUVmax threshold appears to offer the most balanced overall workstation-based setting in syngo.via, supporting lesion detection while preserving clinically meaningful estimates of disease extent for staging and treatment monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kheruka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: