Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares SUV4.0 and multi-threshold methods for segmenting PET-CT in follicular lymphoma, indicating preference for simpler approaches.
Among the single threshold methods, SUV4.0 is preferred regarding ease-of-use, observer variability and segmentation quality. While the multi-threshold lesion-based methods showed the a higher segmentation quality, SUV4.0 has the benefit of easy implementation, wide availability and is in-line with the currently set benchmark for lymphoma PET analysis. We identified SUV4.0 and a lesion-based method as the candidate methods preferred for further clinical performance evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nijman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: