Key result
Fixed-dose polypill adherence strongly correlates with reduced LVMM compared to separate pills.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the association between treatment adherence and left ventricular myocardial mass in patients receiving a fixed-dose polypill versus separate drug administration.
Does a fixed-dose polypill (lisinopril/amlodipine/rosuvastatin) improve treatment adherence and left ventricular myocardial mass regression compared to separate drug administration in patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia?
RCT (n=120)
randomized
Does a fixed-dose polypill (lisinopril/amlodipine/rosuvastatin) improve treatment adherence and left ventricular myocardial mass regression compared to separate drug administration in patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia?
Absolute Event Rate: -0.5768% vs -0.0452%
p-value: p=0.001
A fixed-dose polypill strategy for hypertension and dyslipidemia is associated with better adherence and greater regression of left ventricular mass compared to taking medications separately.
Higher polypill adherence links to greater LV mass regression; extends RCT evidence for fixed-dose combinations in hypertension.
Objective: To evaluate the association between adherence to therapy (assessed by the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, MMAS-8) and left ventricular myocardial mass (LVMM) in patients receiving a fixed-dose combination polypill (lisinopril/amlodipine/rosuvastatin) compared with separate therapy (perindopril/amlodipine and rosuvastatin) over a 6-month follow-up. Design and method: The study included 120 patients with arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia at high or very high cardiovascular risk (SCORE2: 18.12 ± 7.83). The mean age was 52.5 ± 9.6 years; the mean duration of hypertension was 8.7 ± 6.6 years. Treatment adherence was evaluated using the MMAS-8 questionnaire. LVMM was measured by transthoracic echocardiography. Patients were randomized into two treatment groups receiving dual antihypertensive therapy plus statin (ACE inhibitor + calcium channel blocker + statin): Group 1 (n = 60): fixed-dose polypill (lisinopril/amlodipine/rosuvastatin); Group 2 (n = 60): separate administration (perindopril/amlodipine and rosuvastatin). Statistical analysis was performed using standard methods of descriptive and correlation statistics. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs) was applied. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 Results: In the polypill group, a statistically significant moderate negative correlation was observed between MMAS-8 scores and LVMM (rs = -0.5768; p =0.001), indicating a greater degree of myocardial mass regression in patients with higher adherence. In contrast, the group receiving separate therapy demonstrated no significant relationship between adherence and LVMM (rs = -0.0452; p = 0.74). The absence of correlation may reflect overall lower adherence in this group, which limits the effect of therapy on reverse left ventricular remodeling. Conclusions: Fixed-dose combination therapy with lisinopril, amlodipine, and rosuvastatin (polypill) is associated with higher medication adherence and greater regression of left ventricular myocardial mass compared with a separate treatment regimen. These findings support the clinical advantages of the polypill strategy in improving adherence, treatment efficacy, and cardioprotective effects in long-term antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fayzullaeva et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia (n=120). Fixed-dose combination polypill (lisinopril/amlodipine/rosuvastatin) vs. Separate administration (perindopril/amlodipine and rosuvastatin) was evaluated on Correlation between adherence to therapy (MMAS-8) and left ventricular myocardial mass (LVMM) (p=0.001). A fixed-dose polypill (lisinopril/amlodipine/rosuvastatin) showed a significant negative correlation between medication adherence and left ventricular myocardial mass (rs = -0.5768, p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: