Key result
Radiofrequency renal denervation reduces 3-minute orthostatic SBP elevation by ~8 mmHg vs sham.
Why the study?
Abnormal orthostatic BP adaptation is linked to adverse cardiovascular events, but the effect of catheter-based renal denervation on orthostatic BP adaptation in uncontrolled hypertension needed evaluation.
Does radiofrequency catheter-based renal denervation improve orthostatic blood pressure adaptations in patients with uncontrolled hypertension?
RCT
Sham-controlled
randomly assigned
Yes
Does radiofrequency catheter-based renal denervation improve orthostatic blood pressure adaptations in patients with uncontrolled hypertension?
Mean Difference: -7.9 (95% CI -13.6–-2.3)
p-value: p=0.008
Catheter-based renal denervation attenuates inappropriate orthostatic blood pressure elevations and partially restores normal orthostatic responses in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.
May support RDN for orthostatic BP control in hypertension; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before practice change.
Objective: Abnormal orthostatic blood pressure (BP) adaptation is associated with the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) on orthostatic BP adaptation in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.Design and method: This prospective observational study enrolled patients who had been previously included in the multicenter Iberis-HTN trial and NetrodTM-HTN trial. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to undergo either radiofrequency RDN or a sham procedure. BP and heart rate (HR) changes during a 3-min orthostatic challenge from supine to standing were measured at baseline and 6 months after randomization. Results: At 6 months, the RDN group exhibited a significantly greater reduction in ambulatory blood pressure, office systolic blood pressure (SBP) and BP in both supine and standing positions compared to the sham group. After adjusting for baseline values, the magnitude of changes in orthostatic SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at the 3-minute timepoint, along with the maximum changes observed throughout the 3-minute orthostatic test, was significantly smaller in the RDN group than in the sham group at 6 months (3 min: SBP -7.9 mmHg [95%CI: -13.6 to -2.3], P = 0.008; DBP -6.8 mmHg [95%CI: -11.8 to -1.8], P = 0.010. Maximum: SBP -9.8 mmHg [95%CI: -19.1 to -0.4], P = 0.041; DBP -9.3 mmHg [95%CI: -15.3 to -3.2], P = 0.004). The changes in orthostatic HR at 6 months were comparable between the RDN and the sham group. Conclusions: Catheter-based radiofrequency RDN significantly reduced office BP, ambulatory BP, and BP in both supine and standing positions during active standing at 6 months compared to the sham group. Additionally, RDN attenuated the inappropriate elevation in orthostatic BP and partially restored the normal response pattern to orthostatic challenges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Uncontrolled hypertension. Catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation vs. Sham procedure was evaluated on Change in orthostatic systolic blood pressure at 3 minutes (MD -7.9 mmHg, 95% CI -13.6 to -2.3, p=0.008). Radiofrequency renal denervation significantly attenuated orthostatic SBP elevation at 3 minutes compared to a sham procedure (MD -7.9 mmHg; 95% CI -13.6 to -2.3; P=0.008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: