Historical analysis reveals US antidumping policy shaped by steel industry-state negotiations, suggesting political motivations.
The few scholars who have directly studied the history of US "non-market economy" (NME) antidumping and countervailing duty policy explain its development as either an ideological relic of the Cold War or as a case of business politics. Statistical, historical, legal, and interview data indicate that the development of NME policy was not a result of Cold War ideology or business politics, but instead part of a larger political project by an incumbent US steel industry to receive relief from imports. Steel initially advocated for import quotas, but a semi-autonomous US state refused out of fear of foreign retaliation. The steel industry and the state used the discursive strategy of subterfuge to balance these competing interests.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John Bassney (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: