Key result
Delayed ED arrival affects ~72% of acute stroke patients, linked to education, distance, and awareness.
Cross-Sectional (n=174)
No
More than 70% of acute stroke patients in this cohort missed the critical window for thrombolysis due to delayed ED arrival, highlighting the need for community awareness and improved access to care.
The study aimed to evaluate delays in emergency department (ED) arrival among stroke patients and to identify demographic factors that contribute to these delays. It was a cross-sectional study conducted at the Department of Neurology, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from January to July 2024. A total of 174 patients attending the ED for acute stroke were interviewed. There were 112 men and 62 women, with a mean age of 60.54 ± 12.74 years. One hundred and twenty-six (72.4%) of these patients presented to the ED more than four hours after the onset of stroke symptoms. Factors associated with late arrivals included education level (p <0.001), place of residence (p = 0.043), distance travelled (p <0.001), stroke onset time (p = 0.002), referral from another hospital (p <0.001), and awareness of facilities providing acute stroke care (p <0.001). More than half of patients failed to reach the critical window for thrombolysis because of delays in arrival. Contributing factors comprise insufficient awareness and challenges in accessing care. Prompt community-focused measures are imperative to tackle these issues effectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaidi et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute stroke (n=174). Demographic and logistical factors (education, residence, distance, awareness) was evaluated on Presentation to the emergency department more than four hours after the onset of stroke symptoms. Among acute stroke patients, 72.4% presented to the emergency department >4 hours after symptom onset, with delays significantly associated with education, distance traveled, and facility awareness.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: