Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial evaluates cognitive autonomy index to detect recursive cognitive transitions in AI, suggesting operational criteria for autonomous systems.
This paper introduces the Cognitive Autonomy Index (CAI), a composite operational metric designed to detect recursive cognitive transitions (RCTs) in AI systems. The CAI integrates three measurable components: (1) KL divergence over consecutive model states to quantify belief revision magnitude, (2) workspace activation to measure integration coherence, and (3) CalibrationGain to assess metacognitive quality. A system crosses the cognitive singularity threshold (T_CST) when all three components simultaneously exceed empirically calibrated bounds, triggering a mandatory fail-closed Hard Gate that halts autonomous operation pending human review. Three controlled simulations illustrate the framework's expected behavior and failure modes under toy conditions. A Recurrence-Guided Attention proxy module (RQAA) provides preliminary proxy evidence of measurable divergence signals near putative transition boundaries, with boundary shift signals 12–25× stronger than within-regime baselines. We explicitly bound our claims: the framework does not detect consciousness or sentience; T_CST is not a universal constant and requires per-system empirical calibration; current simulations are proof-of-concept only. The contribution is operational: a formally specified, falsifiable, and instrumentable criterion set for identifying recursive cognitive transitions, formalized within the Cognitive Singularity Theory (CST) research program.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saud Rifat (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: