Soybean (Glycine max L.) is a globally strategic crop valued for its high-quality protein and oil, yet its yield potential is frequently constrained by inconsistent seed germination and a heavy reliance on chemical treatments that carry environmental and health risks. Physical pre-sowing stimulation has emerged as an eco-friendly alternative, but the comparative efficacy of direct current (DC) versus alternating current (AC) high-voltage electric fields—and the mechanistic basis for their differential effects—has remained poorly understood. Here, we systematically compared DC and AC pre-sowing treatments across a comprehensive matrix of field intensities (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 kV/cm) and exposure durations (30, 60, and 120 s) at a fixed electrode gap of 10 cm, using soybean seeds of the Volgogradka 1 cultivar. Germination energy (day 3) and total germination (day 7) were assessed under standardized laboratory conditions in triplicate, followed by a replicated field trial to evaluate plant height, bean yield, and disease incidence. DC treatment significantly outperformed both the untreated control and AC treatment: germination energy increased by up to 60%, and total germination reached 100% compared with 85% in the control. The optimal DC window was identified at 0.8–1.5 kV/cm with a 30 s exposure. In stark contrast, AC treatment at industrial frequency not only failed to enhance germination but also frequently suppressed it and markedly increased susceptibility to fungal crown rot. Field results corroborated these findings: DC-treated seeds produced the highest bean mass (85 g per five plants vs. 80 g in the control), while AC-treated seeds yielded the lowest (72 g). Backward elimination regression analysis revealed that field intensity alone was the sole significant predictor of treatment outcomes, whereas exposure time and interaction effects were non-significant. We conclude that short-duration DC pre-sowing stimulation (1.0 kV/cm, 30–60 s) is a robust, chemically safe, and readily scalable technique for enhancing soybean establishment and yield. Conversely, AC treatment at power frequency is not recommended due to its deleterious effects on plant health and productivity. These findings establish a clear, evidence-based framework for the rational design of electrical seed treatment protocols.
Yudaev et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: