Short communication evaluates vancomycin clearance in ultra-lean elderly patients, suggesting the model underestimates dosing needs.
BACKGROUND: Standard population pharmacokinetic models for vancomycin rely on serum creatinine and body weight, but their performance in ultra-lean elderly patients with sarcopenia remains unclear. This study evaluated the internal consistency of the Japanese practical area under the concentration-time curve-guided therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) model across patients stratified by age and body composition. METHODS: Adult patients receiving vancomycin with TDM were retrospectively analyzed and stratified into 3 groups: ultra-lean Elderly (age ≥75 years, body mass index <18.5 kg/m2, n = 24), standard elderly (age ≥75 years, body mass index ≥ 18.5 kg/m2, n = 68), and young controls (age <65 years, n = 24). The primary outcome was the mean error (ME) between a priori predicted and Bayesian posterior vancomycin clearance (CL) estimates. RESULTS: Although posterior vancomycin CL estimates were comparable between elderly groups (2.1 L/h), a priori predictions were significantly lower in ultra-lean elderly patients (1.7 versus 1.9 L/h, P < 0.001). The model significantly underestimated vancomycin CL in ultra-lean elderly patients (ME = -0.312 L/h, P = 0.038) but not in standard elderly individuals (ME = -0.151 L/h, P = 0.051) or young controls (ME = -0.075 L/h, P = 0.679). Despite lower absolute doses in ultra-lean patients (873 versus 1004 mg/d), weight-normalized doses were significantly higher (22.4 versus 19.1 mg/kg/d, P = 0.014), suggesting that clinical judgment may have partially compensated for conservative model predictions. CONCLUSIONS: The practical area under the concentration-time curve-guided TDM model systematically underestimated CL in ultra-lean elderly patients. Careful interpretation of initial predictions and early TDM remain important in such patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kazumasa Nojima (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: