Evaluates high-pitch dual-source CT imaging for coronary CTA, suggesting improved outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients unable to hold breath.
Objectives: To evaluate the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of third-generation dual-source CT with high-pitch scanning for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who were unable to hold their breath. Methods: A total of 144 patients with AF and inability to hold their breath were enrolled and assigned into 2 groups: the high-pitch scanning group (N=70) and the prospective ECG-triggered sequential scanning group (N=74). Image quality, radiation dose, and diagnostic performance were compared between the 2 groups. Results: The subjective image quality in the high-pitch group was significantly superior to that in the sequential group ( P <0.001), and it was particularly noticeable in mid-distal coronary artery segments. Radiation dose was significantly lower in the high-pitch group (effective dose: 1.52±0.57 vs. 6.23±3.41 mSv, P <0.001). The diagnostic performance for detecting significant coronary artery stenosis (≥50%), as assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) and diagnostic accuracy, was significantly superior in the high-pitch group compared with the sequential group ( P <0.05). Conclusion: Third-generation dual-source CT with high-pitch scanning demonstrated superior image quality, significantly reduced radiation dose, and enhanced diagnostic performance in CCTA for patients with AF who were unable to perform breath-holding. Therefore, it can be recommended as the preferred noninvasive imaging technique for this patient population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: