Examines how organizational instruments impact employee commitment to change, suggesting resource efficiency matters.
For a firm’s change initiative to succeed, its employees must be committed to its implementation. Yet managers struggle to attain or enhance this commitment, particularly in the case of a major change program. Building on the attention-based view and a 2019 survey of employees of a leading German multinational corporation that had recently implemented a major change program, we examine how three organizational instruments influence employees’ attention, and thereby their affective commitment to change: information about the change initiative, participation in its implementation, and financial benefit from its outcome. While each organizational instrument improves employees’ affective commitment to change, we find that information, which allows employees to be “in the know”, has by far the greatest effect. Our observation that the organizational instrument demanding the fewest resources from management seems the most effective suggests that more resources do not always lead to better results, as the attention-based view often assumes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daskalov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: