Key result
Uncontrolled hypertension links to ~24% more hospital admissions and increased specialist visits versus controlled.
Why the study?
Uncontrolled hypertension places a significant burden on the healthcare system, but differences in healthcare resource utilisation according to blood pressure control status in a Chinese population required investigation.
Does uncontrolled hypertension increase healthcare resource utilisation compared to controlled hypertension in patients on >=2 antihypertensive drugs?
Observational (n=11,538)
Yes
Does uncontrolled hypertension increase healthcare resource utilisation compared to controlled hypertension in patients on >=2 antihypertensive drugs?
Uncontrolled hypertension significantly increases healthcare resource utilization, including hospital admissions and specialist visits, highlighting the economic and systemic burden of inadequate blood pressure management.
Highlights potential HCRU burden from uncontrolled hypertension; leaves open whether tighter control reduces utilization in resistant cases.
Objective: Uncontrolled hypertension (HTN) represents a major public health concern, requiring increased engagement with healthcare providers and placing a significant burden on the healthcare system. The present analysis aimed to investigate differences in healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) according to blood pressure control status in a Chinese population. Design and method: Patients in Tianjin, China with a diagnosis of HTN treated with >=2 antihypertensive drugs between 2018 to 2023 were identified using regional electronic health record data. Patients were considered uncontrolled if their first blood pressure (BP) measurement while treated with >=2 antihypertensive drugs for at least 28 days (index date) was above 130/80mmHg for patients aged <80 years old and above 140/90 mmHg for patients aged >=80 years old. All-cause related HCRU was assessed using negative binomial models adjusted for baseline patient characteristics and comorbidities through a risk score derived from random forest models. Results: A total of 11,538 patients (uncontrolled HTN n=6,932; controlled HTN n=4,606) were included. In adjusted models, HCRU was generally higher among patients with uncontrolled compared with controlled HTN. Specifically, the rate (per-patient-per-year) of any outpatient specialist appointments was higher in patients with uncontrolled HTN (rate ratio [RR]: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05, 1.12). Breaking this down by specialty, patients with uncontrolled HTN had higher rates of nephrology (RR: 2.32, 95% CI: 1.89, 2.84) and endocrinology appointments (RR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.29) compared to patients with controlled HTN. The hospital admission rate (RR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.32) was also higher among patients with uncontrolled compared to controlled HTN. Together, these contributed to a higher attendance at the more specialised Tier III hospitals in patients with uncontrolled versus controlled HTN (RR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.18). Conclusions: In this large metropolitan region in Northern China, uncontrolled HTN is associated with increased HCRU, including a greater utilisation of more specialised services, when compared with controlled HTN. These findings highlight the urgent need for more effective blood pressure management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Hypertension (n=11,538). Uncontrolled hypertension vs. Controlled hypertension was evaluated on Rate of any outpatient specialist appointments (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.05-1.12). Uncontrolled hypertension was associated with higher rates of outpatient specialist appointments (RR 1.08; 95% CI 1.05-1.12) and hospital admissions (RR 1.24; 95% CI 1.17-1.32) versus controlled.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: