Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores collider stratification bias in metabolic exposures and rotator cuff tears, indicating effects of imaging on outcomes.
Electronic health record (EHR) data are increasingly used for case-control investigations. Using multiple control groups in de-identified EHR-data we evidence how conditioning on imaging (descendent of a collider: symptomology) can perturb exposure estimations enough to reverse conclusions. Because imaging is often required for rotator cuff tear diagnosis, some argue imaging should be required for control selection. We constructed two control groups (with vs. without imaging) to evaluate selection bias through collider stratification involving metabolic exposures-body mass index (BMI), type 1 diabetes (T1D), and type 2 diabetes (T2D)-and rotator cuff tears. Cases and controls were identified using validated algorithms. We compared baseline characteristics and performed multivariable logistic regression across designs. Cases were older and more likely to have arthritis (57%), ligamentous disease (9%), and prior shoulder injury (99%) than controls. Controls requiring imaging more closely resembled cases, with more arthritis (9% vs. 1%), ligamentous disease (6% vs. 2%), and prior shoulder injury (54% vs. 7%). T1D prevalence was 3% in cases, 4% in controls-with-imaging, and 1% in controls-without, compared to ~1% nationally. T1D was positively associated with tears using controls-without-imaging (aOR=1.78; 95% CI: 1.64-1.92), but inversely using controls-with-imaging (aOR=0.75; 0.57-0.97).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simone et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: