Why the study?
Can biofeedback modify locus of control orientation, and does locus of control predict biofeedback performance?
Can biofeedback modify locus of control orientation, and does locus of control predict biofeedback performance?
Current literature provides contradictory evidence on the relationship between locus of control and biofeedback performance, and lacks long-term follow-up to confirm if biofeedback can permanently modify locus of control.
Inconclusive evidence precludes clinical use of biofeedback to modify locus of control; longitudinal trials needed to resolve relationships.
This paper first reviews studies which have investigated the efficacy of using locus of control orientation to predict performance in various modes of biofeedback. However, contradictory evidence and methodological problems make it impossible to draw any conclusions regarding the connection between internality-externality and biofeedback performance. Second, various attempts to modify externality through biofeedback treatment are reviewed. Although EMG feedback can apparently be used to shift locus of control in an internal direction, there are some major issues that need to be resolved. Of primary importance is the fact that the rationale for modifying externality is based on an unproven assumption that externality has a role in the causation of various undesirable behaviors. Also, as no follow-up testing has been done, there is no evidence that the EMG biofeedback causes relatively permanent, stable locus of control changes. If the shifts are only temporary, then its use as a modifier of externality is questionable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gregory D. Zimet (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: