Demonstrates improved protein interaction predictions using pseudo-dimers derived from monomers, suggesting a new scalable pre-training method.
Accurately predicting protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in dimeric complexes remains a fundamental challenge in computational biology. Although existing PPIs prediction models, such as AlphaFold-Multimer (AF-Multimer) and AlphaFold3 (AF3), have achieved impressive performance, they still suffer from unsatisfactory accuracy due to the limited availability of protein dimer structures, whose collection is both expensive and labor-intensive. Here, we introduce a simple yet effective pre-training method, termed split and merge proxy (SMP), that leverages abundant monomeric proteins to simulate various PPIs tasks for the first time. Specifically, SMP constructs pseudo-dimers by splitting monomer data into two subunits, referred to as pseudo-receptors and pseudo-ligands, and trains models to merge them back by predicting their pseudo interactions (e.g., contact or docking). This proxy task enables large-scale pre-training without additional cost. Models pre-trained with SMP and subsequently fine-tuned on real protein dimer datasets demonstrate consistently improved accuracy and generalization across multiple benchmarks, surpassing strong baselines. Notably, SMP delivers more accurate structure predictions than both AF-Multimer and AF3 on several CASP15 dimer targets. Our findings highlight SMP as a scalable strategy for harnessing monomeric data to advance protein complex modeling, providing insights into the linkage between monomers and multimers. Accurate prediction of protein-protein interactions is limited by the scarcity of high-quality complex structures. Here, authors introduce SMP, a strategy that leverages pseudo-dimers derived from monomers to improve accuracy and generalization across diverse protein interaction applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Du et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: