Key result
AI improves anesthesiology monitoring and workflow but raises ethical concerns regarding bias and data protection.
Why the study?
AI offers multiple benefits in anesthesiology, but ethical concerns, bias, and practical challenges arise across AI research and deployment.
This perspective highlights the ethical frameworks, potential biases, and challenges of implementing artificial intelligence in anesthesiology and healthcare.
Clinicians should approach AI adoption in anesthesiology with caution; leaves open development of robust ethical frameworks and bias mitigation strategies.
Anesthesiology is well positioned to benefit from applications of artificial intelligence on multiple elements such as monitoring the depth of anesthesia, control of anesthetic machine functions, ultrasound guidance for procedures and diagnosis, adverse event prediction, pain assessment and management, and optimising the operating room workflow. The ethical concerns can arise from multiple aspects of AI research and deployment such as the nature and source of the data, data collection methodologies, AI models design, output interpretation and inappropriate use. AI solution can have the unintended consequences like perpetuation of systematic biases and discrimination towards under-represented sections of society. There could be conflicts about data protection, intellectual property rights and economic gains. Also, the research must be transparent and solutions feasible. The clinician’s role is ever changing in this landscape. We will discuss the broad ethical frameworks that are applicable to developing and using AI in medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gandotra et al. (2023) conducted a review in Anesthesia and healthcare. Artificial intelligence was evaluated. Artificial intelligence in anesthesiology offers benefits for monitoring and workflow, but raises ethical concerns regarding systematic biases, data protection, and the evolving role of clinicians.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: