Why the study?
Does smoking influence waist circumference and the prevalence of obesity-related disorders differently in nonobese versus obese men?
Does smoking influence waist circumference and the prevalence of obesity-related disorders differently in nonobese versus obese men?
Smoking is associated with an increased prevalence of metabolic disorders in nonobese men without increasing visceral fat, while in obese men it is associated with increased visceral fat accumulation at a younger age.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suggests broader metabolic screening in nonobese smokers; hypothesis-generating for obesity-stratified effects and requires longitudinal confirmation.
This study investigated whether smoking habits had a differential influence on waist circumference and obesity-related disorders in nonobese and obese men. We investigated 359 men with smoking habits confirmed by their spouses, including 172 nonobese men (BMI<25) and 187 obese men (BMI>or=25). There were 113 nonobese smokers and 129 obese smokers. Obesity-related disorders were defined as hypertension, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, hyperuricemia, or treatment for one or more of these disorders. Nonobese subjects showed no differences of age, BMI, and waist circumference between smokers and nonsmokers, but smokers had a higher incidence of obesity-related disorders. Obese smokers were younger than obese nonsmokers and had a larger waist circumference, but a similar prevalence of obesity-related disorders. The prevalence of obesity-related disorders was similar between obese nonsmokers and smokers, but the smokers were younger. In nonobese subjects, smoking may increase obesity-related disorders by a mechanism other than visceral fat accumulation. In obese subjects, however, smoking may promote visceral fat accumulation. Further investigations will be necessary to better elucidate the relationship between the promotion of visceral fat accumulation in obese subjects by smoking and obesity-related disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mizuno et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: