Key result
Concomitant epidural anesthesia reduces the propofol EC50 for loss of consciousness by ~12% versus general anesthesia.
Why the study?
The effect of epidural anesthesia on general anesthetic requirements had not been well investigated, despite combined epidural-general anesthesia being recommended for thoracic and abdominal surgery.
Does combined epidural-general anesthesia reduce the propofol EC50 for inducing loss of consciousness in patients undergoing gastrectomy compared to general anesthesia alone?
RCT (n=60)
Double-blind
computer-generated numbers
No
Does combined epidural-general anesthesia reduce the propofol EC50 for inducing loss of consciousness in patients undergoing gastrectomy compared to general anesthesia alone?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.97% vs 3.36%
p-value: p=0.036
Concomitant epidural anesthesia significantly reduces the propofol EC50 required for loss of consciousness and decreases intraoperative anesthetic consumption while shortening emergence time.
Supports lower propofol dosing for induction with combined epidural-general anesthesia; extends evidence on anesthetic interactions in gastrectomy.
Background Combined epidural-general anesthesia (GA + EA) has been recommended as a preferred technique for both thoracic and abdominal surgery. The epidural anesthesia on the general anesthetic (GA) requirements has not been well investigated. Therefore, we conducted the present study to explore the predicted effect-site concentration of propofol (Ce prop ) required for achieving the loss of consciousness (LOC) in 50% of patients (EC 50 ) with or without epidural anesthesia. Methods Sixty patients scheduled for gastrectomy were randomized into the GA + EA group or GA alone group to receive general anesthesia alone. Ropivacaine 0.375% was used for epidural anesthesia to achieve a sensory level of T4 or above prior to the induction of general anesthesia. The EC 50 of predicted Ce prop for LOC was determined by the up–down sequential method. The consumption of anesthetics, emergence time from anesthesia, and postoperative outcomes were also recorded and compared. Results The EC 50 of predicted Ce prop for LOC was lower in the GA + EA group than in the GA alone group [2.97 (95% CI: 2.63–3.31) vs. 3.36 (95% CI: 3.19–3.53) μg mL −1 , ( p = 0.036)]. The consumption of anesthetics was lower in the GA + EA group than in the GA alone group (propofol: 0.11 ± 0.02 vs. 0.13 ± 0.02 mg kg −1 min −1 , p = 0.014; remifentanil: 0.08 ± 0.03 vs. 0.14 ± 0.04 μg kg −1 min −1 , p < 0.001). The emergence time was shorter in the GA + EA group than in the GA alone group (16.0 vs. 20.5 min, p = 0.013). Conclusion Concomitant epidural anesthesia reduced by 15% the EC 50 of predicted Ce prop for LOC, decreased the consumptions of propofol and remifentanil during maintenance of anesthesia, and fastened recovery from anesthesia. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov , identifier: NCT05124704.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Gastric cancer (n=60). Combined epidural-general anesthesia vs. General anesthesia alone was evaluated on EC50 of predicted effect-site concentration of propofol for loss of consciousness (p=0.036). Concomitant epidural anesthesia significantly reduced the EC50 of predicted effect-site concentration of propofol required for loss of consciousness compared to general anesthesia alone (2.97 vs. 3.36 μg/mL).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: