Why the study?
Does propofol induction and maintenance improve maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to thiopentone/enflurane in women undergoing elective Caesarean section?
Does propofol induction and maintenance improve maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to thiopentone/enflurane in women undergoing elective Caesarean section?
Propofol provides a shorter duration of hypertensive response after intubation compared to thiopentone/enflurane during elective Caesarean section, with comparable maternal recovery and neonatal outcomes, though prolonged infusion may affect neonatal neurologic scores.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May favor propofol for intubation hemodynamics in elective Caesarean section; leaves open routine adoption pending randomized confirmation.
A propofol infusion regimen and a standard general anaesthetic were compared in 40 Chinese women undergoing elective Caesarean section. Twenty patients received propofol 2 mg/kg for induction of anaesthesia followed by propofol 6 mg/kg/hour, while 20 patients received thiopentone 4 mg/kg with enflurane 1% for maintenance of anaesthesia. All patients were given atracurium and their lungs ventilated with nitrous oxide 50% in oxygen until delivery of the neonate. The hypertensive response after intubation was of shorter duration in the propofol group compared with the thiopentone group. Induction to delivery times ranged from 5 to 14 minutes and neonates from both groups had similar and satisfactory Apgar scores. Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Scores and umbilical cord blood gas analysis. However, a prolonged propofol infusion time before delivery may cause lower Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Scores. There were no differences in maternal recovery times or psychomotor performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
YAU et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: