Key result
Sugammadex significantly shortened the time from intubation to the start of motor-evoked potential monitoring after neuromuscular blockade recovery compared to spontaneous recovery (P < .0001).
Why the study?
Neuromuscular blockade can affect the amplitude and detection success rate of motor-evoked potentials, prompting intraoperative sugammadex administration, but factors affecting residual blockade and its relationship to monitoring success required evaluation in spine surgery.
Does sugammadex improve motor-evoked potential detection success rates and shorten the time to start monitoring in patients undergoing spine surgery?
Observational (n=373)
No
Does sugammadex improve motor-evoked potential detection success rates and shorten the time to start monitoring in patients undergoing spine surgery?
p-value: p=< .0001
Sugammadex administration during spine surgery shortens the time to start motor-evoked potential monitoring, and higher train-of-four ratios are associated with better MEP detection success rates.
May enable earlier MEP monitoring in spine surgery; hypothesis-generating, needs RCTs to confirm.
Given neuromuscular blockade (NMB) can affect the amplitude and detection success rate of motor-evoked potentials (MEP), sugammadex may be administered intraoperatively. We evaluated the factors affecting the degree of residual NMB (i.e., the train-of-four [TOF] ratio) and the relationship between TOF ratio and MEP detection success rate in Japanese patients undergoing spine surgery. This single-center retrospective observational study included adults who underwent spine surgery under propofol/remifentanil anesthesia, received rocuronium for intubation, and underwent myogenic MEP monitoring after transcranial stimulation. TOF ratios were assessed using electromyography. Sugammadex was administered after finishing the MEP setting and the TOF ratio was ≤0.7. To identify factors affecting the TOF ratio, TOF ratio and MEP detection success rate were simultaneously measured after finishing the MEP setting; to compare the time from intubation to the start of MEP monitoring after NMB recovery between sugammadex and spontaneous recovery groups, multivariable analyses were performed. Of 373 cases analyzed, sugammadex was administered to 221 (59.2%) cases. Age, blood pressure, hepatic impairment, and rocuronium dose were the main factors affecting the TOF ratio. Patients with higher TOF ratios (≥0.75) had higher MEP detection success rates. The time from intubation to the start of MEP monitoring after NMB recovery was significantly shorter in patients administered sugammadex versus patients without sugammadex (P < .0001). The MEP detection success rate was higher in patients with a TOF ratio of ≥0.75. Sugammadex shortened the time from intubation to the start of MEP monitoring after NMB recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hayashi et al. (2022) conducted an observational in spine surgery (n=373). Sugammadex vs. Spontaneous recovery (no sugammadex) was evaluated on Time from intubation to the start of MEP monitoring after NMB recovery (p=< .0001). Sugammadex significantly shortened the time from intubation to the start of motor-evoked potential monitoring after neuromuscular blockade recovery compared to spontaneous recovery (P < .0001).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: