Key result
Preclinical evidence suggests that high density lipoprotein and its precursor protein apolipoprotein A1 may protect against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity both directly and indirectly.
Why the study?
Many cancer therapies, particularly anthracyclines such as doxorubicin, cause deleterious cardiotoxicity and heart failure, motivating the review of potential therapeutics to prevent this toxicity.
HDL and ApoA1 represent potential therapeutic targets to prevent anthracycline-associated cardiotoxicity based on emerging preclinical evidence.
Hypothesis-generating for HDL/ApoA1 modulation in anthracycline cardiotoxicity; clinical translation trials needed before any practice consideration.
Cardiovascular disease and cancer are the leading causes of death in developed societies. Despite their effectiveness, many cancer therapies exhibit deleterious cardiovascular side effects such as cardiotoxicity and heart failure. The cardiotoxic effects of anthracyclines such as doxorubicin are the most well-characterized of cardiotoxic anti-cancer therapies. While other anti-neoplastic drugs also induce cardiotoxicity, often leading to heart failure, they are beyond the scope of this review. This review first summarizes the mechanisms of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. It then reviews emerging preclinical evidence that high density lipoprotein and its precursor protein apolipoprotein A1, which are known for their protective effects against ischemic cardiovascular disease, may also protect against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity both directly and indirectly, when used therapeutically.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kluck et al. (2020) conducted a review in Anthracycline-associated cardiotoxicity. High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) and Apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) was evaluated. Preclinical evidence suggests that high density lipoprotein and its precursor protein apolipoprotein A1 may protect against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity both directly and indirectly.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: