Key result
Automated minimum-cost path CTPA accurately quantifies PE-distal lung mass compared to dynamic CT perfusion.
Why the study?
CTPA is primary for diagnosing pulmonary embolism, but stratifying PE severity using angiography remains challenging.
Does the automated minimum-cost path technique accurately quantify lung tissue at risk distal to a pulmonary embolism compared to dynamic CT perfusion in a swine model?
Does the automated minimum-cost path technique accurately quantify lung tissue at risk distal to a pulmonary embolism compared to dynamic CT perfusion in a swine model?
Absolute Event Rate: 48% vs 47.2%
p-value: p=0.51
The MCP technique using CTPA can accurately quantify the fraction of lung tissue at risk distal to a pulmonary embolism, potentially improving risk stratification.
Supports automated CTPA analysis for PE in animals; leaves open human validation before clinical adoption.
Background: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the primary modality for the detection and diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) while the stratification of PE severity remains challenging using angiography. Hence, an automated minimum-cost path (MCP) technique was validated to quantify the subtended lung tissue distal to emboli using CTPA. Methods: -test. The spatial correspondence was also assessed. Results: -test P=0.51). The mean Dice similarity coefficient was 0.84±0.08. Conclusions: The MCP technique enables accurate assessment of lung tissue at risk distal to a PE using CTPA. This technique can potentially be used to quantify the fraction of lung tissue at risk distal to PE to further improve the risk stratification of PE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2023) studied Pulmonary embolism (animal model) (n=7). Minimum-cost path (MCP) technique using CTPA vs. Dynamic CT perfusion-derived ischemic territory (Reference standard) was evaluated on Mass correspondence between MCP PE-distal territory and REF ischemic territory (p=0.51). The automated minimum-cost path technique accurately quantified the lung tissue territory distal to a pulmonary embolism, showing no significant difference in mass compared to the reference standard (48.0 g vs 47.2 g, P=0.51).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: