Key result
Adapted CBT fails to reduce health anxiety over standard care in recurrent non-cardiac chest pain.
Why the study?
Does adapted cognitive behavioural therapy improve health anxiety in adults with recurrent non-cardiac chest pain?
RCT (n=68)
Single-blind (assessors blind to treatment allocation)
Remote web-based system, permuted stacked blocks, stratified by study centre
Yes
Does adapted cognitive behavioural therapy improve health anxiety in adults with recurrent non-cardiac chest pain?
Mean Difference: 0.94 (95% CI -2.3–4.17)
Absolute Event Rate: -2.35% vs -3.29%
p-value: p=0.569
Although CBT-CP did not significantly improve health anxiety scores, it was associated with non-significant reductions in healthcare utilization and costs, suggesting potential cost-effectiveness if adequately powered.
Adapted CBT does not reduce health anxiety in recurrent non-cardiac chest pain; challenges routine use while leaving cost savings open for larger trials.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of a modified form of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for recurrent non-cardiac chest pain. METHODS: We tested the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a modified form of CBT for chest pain (CBT-CP)(4-10 sessions) in patients who attended cardiology clinics or emergency medical services repeatedly. Patients were randomised using a remote web-based system to CBT-CP or to standard care in the clinic. Assessments were made at baseline and at 6 months and 12 months. The primary outcome was the change in the Health Anxiety Inventory Score at 6 months. Other clinical measures, social functioning, quality of life and costs of services were also recorded. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were randomised with low attrition rates at 6 months and 12 months with 81% of all possible assessments completed at 6 months and 12 months. Although there were no significant group differences between any of the outcome measures at either 6 months or 12 months, patients receiving CBT-CP had between two and three times fewer hospital bed days, outpatient appointments, and A&E attendances than those allocated to standard care and total costs per patient were £1496.49 lower, though the differences in costs were not significant. There was a small non-significant gain in quality adjusted life years in those allocated to CBT-CP compared with standard care (0.76 vs 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that CBT-CP in the context of current hospital structures is not a viable treatment, but is worthy of further research as a potentially cost-effective treatment for non-cardiac chest pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 14711101.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tyrer et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Recurrent non-cardiac chest pain (n=68). Adapted cognitive behavioural therapy for chest pain (CBT-CP) vs. Standard care was evaluated on Change in the Health Anxiety Inventory (HAI) Score at 6 months (MD 0.94, 95% CI -2.30 to 4.17, p=0.569). Adapted cognitive behavioural therapy did not significantly improve Health Anxiety Inventory scores at 6 months compared to standard care (MD 0.94, 95% CI -2.30 to 4.17, p=0.569) in patients with recurrent non-cardiac chest pain.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: