Key result
AF linked to greater carotid intima-media thickness and higher SDMA levels compared with ESUS.
Why the study?
Because a relevant proportion of embolic strokes of undetermined source are thought to be caused by undetected AF, investigators evaluated whether endothelial dysfunction and damage markers indicate AF risk in embolic stroke.
Do markers of endothelial dysfunction and carotid intima-media thickness differ between patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source and those with atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=88)
No
Do markers of endothelial dysfunction and carotid intima-media thickness differ between patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source and those with atrial fibrillation?
p-value: p=<0.001
Biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and carotid intima-media thickness may help identify patients with embolic stroke who are at high risk for underlying atrial fibrillation.
CIMT and SDMA differences may aid AF risk stratification in ESUS; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
A relevant part of embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS) is assumed to be due to non-detected atrial fibrillation (AF). In this study, we aimed to investigate if markers of endothelial dysfunction and damage may indicate AF risk in embolic stroke. Eighty-eight patients with ischemic stroke confirmed by imaging were assigned to one of three groups: ESUS, AF, or micro-/macroangiopathy. ESUS patients underwent prolonged Holter electrocardiography scheduled for three days. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), the CHA2DS2VASC score, and the carotid intima–media thickness (CIMT) were obtained. Markers of endothelial (dys)function (L-arginine, asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA)) were measured at day seven after stroke. ESUS patients were younger and had fewer cardiovascular risk factors than patients with determined stroke etiology. Compared with AF patients, ESUS patients showed significantly lower values of SDMA (p = 0.004) and higher values of L-arginine (p = 0.031), L-arginine/ADMA ratio (p = 0.006), L-arginine/SDMA ratio (p = 0.002), and ADMA/SDMA ratio (p = 0.013). Concordant differences could be observed comparing ESUS patients with those with newly diagnosed AF (p = 0.026; p = 0.03; p = 0.009; p = 0.004; and p = 0.046, respectively). CIMT was significantly larger in AF than in ESUS patients (p < 0.001), and was identified as an AF risk factor independent from CHA2DS2VASC in the regression analysis (p = 0.014). These findings may support future stratification for AF risk in patients who have suffered embolic stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Große et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Acute ischemic stroke (ESUS, AF, or angiopathy) (n=88). Atrial Fibrillation vs. Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS) was evaluated on Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) (p=<0.001). Patients with atrial fibrillation had significantly larger carotid intima-media thickness (p < 0.001) and higher symmetric dimethylarginine levels (p = 0.004) compared to patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: