Key result
Among adults with coeliac disease, participation in face-to-face social support networks was associated with higher quality of life scores compared to online support (72.6 vs 66.7; P < 0.0001).
Why the study?
Does participation in face-to-face versus online social support networks improve quality of life in adults with coeliac disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,138)
Does participation in face-to-face versus online social support networks improve quality of life in adults with coeliac disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 72.6% vs 66.7%
p-value: p=< 0.0001
Participation in face-to-face social support networks is associated with higher quality of life scores compared to online support in adults with coeliac disease.
Face-to-face support linked to higher QoL in coeliac disease; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice without trials.
BACKGROUND: There is little information available on the use of social support systems for patients with coeliac disease (CD). We performed a cross-sectional study aiming to examine the association between participation in different types of social support networks and quality of life (QOL) in adults with CD. METHODS: A survey including a validated CD specific QOL instrument was administered online and in-person to adults with CD who were following a gluten-free diet. Participation in social support networks (type, frequency and duration) were assessed. RESULTS: Among the 2138 participants, overall QOL scores were high, averaging 68.9 out of 100. Significant differences in QOL scores were found for age, length of time since diagnosis and level of education. Most (58%) reported using no social support networks. Of the 42% reporting use of social support networks (online 17.9%, face-to-face 10.8% or both 12.8%), QOL scores were higher for those individuals who used only face-to-face social support compared to only online support (72.6 versus 66.7; P < 0.0001). A longer duration of face-to-face social support use was associated with higher QOL scores (P < 0.0005). By contrast, a longer duration and increased frequency of online social support use was associated with lower QOL scores (P < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Participation in face-to-face social support networks is associated with greater QOL scores compared to online social support networks. These findings have potential implications for the management of individuals with CD. Emphasis on face-to-face support may improve long-term QOL and patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Coeliac disease (n=2,138). Face-to-face social support networks vs. Online social support networks was evaluated on Quality of life (QOL) score (p=< 0.0001). Among adults with coeliac disease, participation in face-to-face social support networks was associated with higher quality of life scores compared to online support (72.6 vs 66.7; P < 0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: