Key result
The presence of dynamic dyssynchrony during dobutamine stress was an independent predictor of cardiovascular events (HR 7.591) in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.
Why the study?
Does dynamic left ventricular dyssynchrony assessed during dobutamine stress predict cardiovascular events in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=70)
No
Does dynamic left ventricular dyssynchrony assessed during dobutamine stress predict cardiovascular events in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Hazard Ratio: 7.591 (95% CI 2.034–28.33)
p-value: p=0.003
Dynamic dyssynchrony assessed by 3D speckle-tracking during dobutamine stress is a strong independent predictor of cardiovascular events in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
May refine risk stratification in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony is not a stable phenomenon, but rather, changes dynamically. Given that the prognostic impact of dynamic dyssynchrony has not yet been elucidated, the objective was to investigate the clinical impact of dynamic dyssynchrony on patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy DCM patients with ejection fraction 32±9% were retrospectively recruited, and 3-dimensional speckle-tracking area strain was used to measure both contractile reserve and changes in dyssynchrony during dobutamine stress. The standard deviation of time-to-peak area strain was adopted as the systolic dyssynchrony index. Event-free survival was then tracked over a 13-month period. A ≥7.55% increase in systolic dyssynchrony index during dobutamine stress (Δsystolic dyssynchrony index) was the best predictor of cardiovascular events with 77% sensitivity and 88% specificity. Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that not only the absence of contractile reserve (Δglobal area strain ≤21.1%: hazard ratio [HR], 15.29; P=0.01), but the presence of dynamic dyssynchrony (ΔLV dyssynchrony ≥7.55%: HR: 7.591; P=0.003) was an independent predictor of cardiovascular events. Importantly, absence of dynamic dyssynchrony and presence of contractile reserve were associated with the most favorable outcome (98%), whereas the reverse condition was associated with the worst outcome (20%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic dyssynchrony is a potential predictor of cardiovascular events in patients with DCM, while assessment of dynamic dyssynchrony in combination with contractile reserve may further improve prognostic risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsumoto et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy (n=70). Dynamic dyssynchrony during dobutamine stress (Δsystolic dyssynchrony index ≥7.55%) vs. Absence of dynamic dyssynchrony (Δsystolic dyssynchrony index <7.55%) was evaluated on Cardiovascular events (death from or hospitalization for deteriorating heart failure, and sudden cardiac death) (HR 7.591, 95% CI 2.034-28.33, p=0.003). The presence of dynamic dyssynchrony during dobutamine stress was an independent predictor of cardiovascular events (HR 7.591) in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: