Key result
Adding a PPI to aspirin for primary CHD prevention in men with average GI bleeding risk is not cost-effective, with an incremental cost of $447,077 per QALY compared to aspirin alone.
Why the study?
Does low-dose aspirin with or without a PPI improve cost-utility for primary prevention of CHD in men?
Does low-dose aspirin with or without a PPI improve cost-utility for primary prevention of CHD in men?
Effect estimate: $447,077 per QALY
Aspirin is cost-effective for primary CHD prevention in men >45 years with >10% 10-year CHD risk, but adding a PPI is only cost-effective for those with high GI bleeding risk (>4-6 per 1000 annually).
PPI addition to aspirin lacks cost-effectiveness for average GI risk; leaves open utility only in high-bleeding-risk subgroups.
BACKGROUND: Aspirin reduces myocardial infarction but increases gastrointestinal tract (GI) bleeding. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may reduce upper GI bleeding. We estimate the cost-utility of aspirin treatment with or without a PPI for coronary heart disease (CHD) prevention among men at different risks for CHD and GI bleeding. METHODS: We updated a Markov model to compare costs and outcomes of low-dose aspirin plus PPI (omeprazole, 20 mg/d), low-dose aspirin alone, or no treatment for CHD prevention. We performed lifetime analyses in men with different risks for cardiovascular events and GI bleeding. Aspirin reduced nonfatal myocardial infarction by 30%, increased total stroke by 6%, and increased GI bleeding risk 2-fold. Adding a PPI reduced upper GI bleeding by 80%. Annual aspirin cost was $13.99; the generic PPI cost was $200.00. RESULTS: In 45-year-old men with a 10-year CHD risk of 10% and 0.8 per 1000 annual GI bleeding risk, aspirin ($17,571 and 18.67 quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) was more effective and less costly than no treatment ($18,483 and 18.44 QALYs). Compared with aspirin alone, aspirin plus PPI ($21,037 and 18.68 QALYs) had an incremental cost per QALY of $447,077. Results were similar in 55- and 65-year-old men. The incremental cost per QALY of adding a PPI was less than $50,000 per QALY at annual GI bleeding probabilities greater than 4 to 6 per 1000. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with aspirin for CHD prevention is less costly and more effective than no treatment in men older than 45 years with greater than 10-year, 10% CHD risks. Adding a PPI is not cost-effective for men with average GI bleeding risk but may be cost-effective for selected men at increased risk for GI bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Earnshaw et al. (2011) studied Coronary heart disease prevention. Low-dose aspirin plus PPI (omeprazole) vs. Low-dose aspirin alone or no treatment was evaluated on Cost-utility (incremental cost per QALY) ($447,077 per QALY). Adding a PPI to aspirin for primary CHD prevention in men with average GI bleeding risk is not cost-effective, with an incremental cost of $447,077 per QALY compared to aspirin alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: