PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 2005Poultry Science241 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of slower-growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: meat quality

View Full Paper
AFA.C. FanaticoLCL.C. CavittPPP.B. Pillai

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Consumer interest in organic and natural poultry products raised with outdoor access is growing. An experiment was conducted to assess the effects of outdoor access and genotype on meat quality. One slow-growing genotype (S), 2 medium-growing genotypes (M1 and M2), and a commercial fast-growing genotype (F) were raised (straight-run) for 81, 67, or 53 d, respectively. The placement date was staggered in order to achieve a similar final body weight. Each genotype was assigned to 3 pens of 24 birds each and raised in indoor floor pens in a naturally ventilated facility; the S and F genotypes were also assigned to 2 floor pens with outdoor access containing 36 birds each. All birds were provided with the same starter, grower, and finisher feeds, and birds were commercially processed. Pectoralis samples were collected at 6 h postmortem for proximate analysis and evaluation of meat quality. The principal effect of outdoor access was to make the meat more yellow in the case of the S genotype (P 0.05). Drip loss and cook loss (%) were affected (P 0.05) by genotype or outdoor access. These data indicate that meat quality differences exist among genotypes with very different growth rates and reared with or without outdoor access.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fanatico et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fdcadd4e6d358970496fchttps://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.11.1785
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper