Key result
Simulations using a PBPK/PD model indicated that vicagrel pharmacokinetics and antiplatelet effects were less influenced by CYP2C19 metabolic phenotypes and CES1 genetic variations compared to clopidogrel.
Why the study?
Studies were warranted to identify genetic and non-genetic factors affecting vicagrel metabolic enzymes (CYP2C19, CES1, and CES2) that may alter its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
Does vicagrel exhibit less pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability due to CYP2C19 and carboxylesterase genetic polymorphisms and inhibitors compared to clopidogrel?
Does vicagrel exhibit less pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability due to CYP2C19 and carboxylesterase genetic polymorphisms and inhibitors compared to clopidogrel?
Vicagrel demonstrates a more consistent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile than clopidogrel, being less affected by CYP2C19 and CES1 genetic polymorphisms or drug-drug interactions.
May offer more consistent antiplatelet effects than clopidogrel across CYP2C19/CES1 variants; hypothesis-generating and requires human validation.
Vicagrel, a novel acetate derivative of clopidogrel, exhibits a favorable safety profile and excellent antiplatelet activity. Studies aim at identifying genetic and non-genetic factors affecting vicagrel metabolic enzymes Cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19), Carboxylesterase (CES) 1 and 2 (CES1 and CES2), which may potentially lead to altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, are warranted. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) model incorporating vicagrel and its metabolites was constructed, verified and validated in our study, which could simultaneously characterize its sequential two step metabolism and clinical response. Simulations were then performed to evaluate the effects of CYP2C19, CES1 and CES2 genetic polymorphisms as well as inhibitors of these enzymes on vicagrel pharmacokinetics and antiplatelet effects. Results suggested vicagrel was less influenced by CYP2C19 metabolic phenotypes and CES1 428 G > A variation, in comparison to clopidogrel. No pharmacokinetic difference in the active metabolite was also noted for volunteers carrying different CES2 genotypes. Omeprazole, a CYP2C19 inhibitor, and simvastatin, a CES1 and CES2 inhibitor, showed weak impact on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vicagrel. This is the first study proposing a dynamic PBPK/PD model of vicagrel able to capture its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles simultaneously. Simulations indicated that genetic polymorphisms and drug-drug interactions showed no clinical relevance for vicagrel, suggesting its potential advantages over clopidogrel for treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Our model can be utilized to support further clinical trial design aiming at exploring the effects of genetic polymorphisms and drug-drug interactions on PK and PD of this novel antiplatelet agent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2020) studied Healthy volunteers (simulated) (n=100). Vicagrel vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on Pharmacokinetics (AM-H4 concentration) and pharmacodynamics (inhibition of platelet aggregation). Simulations using a PBPK/PD model indicated that vicagrel pharmacokinetics and antiplatelet effects were less influenced by CYP2C19 metabolic phenotypes and CES1 genetic variations compared to clopidogrel.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: