Key result
Additional cavotricuspid isthmus block ablation did not improve outcomes, with unadjusted late-onset atrial arrhythmia recurrence higher than PVI alone (38.6% vs 12.2%; P<.001).
Why the study?
The role of additional cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) block ablation remains controversial in AF patients without atrial flutter.
Does additional cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) block ablation reduce atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients without atrial flutter undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
Cohort (n=139)
Does additional cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) block ablation reduce atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients without atrial flutter undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
Absolute Event Rate: 38.6% vs 12.2%
p-value: p=< .001
Performing additional cavotricuspid isthmus block ablation during pulmonary vein isolation does not improve clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients without a history of atrial flutter.
Additional CTI ablation warrants caution during AF ablation without flutter; leaves open whether higher recurrence reflects selection bias.
AIMS: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective procedure for atrial fibrillation (AF). The role of additional cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) block ablation remains controversial in AF patients without atrial flutter (AFL). Therefore, this study aimed to explore the clinical outcome of additional CTI block ablation in patients without AFL. METHODS: Between January 2013 and December 2017, a total of 139 patients who did not have documented AFL and who underwent catheter ablation for AF were recruited. Fifty-seven patients were classified in additional CTI block ablation group and 82 patients were classified in without CTI group. The incidence of early-onset and late-onset atrial arrhythmia recurrence was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The additional CTI group had a higher prevalence of persistent or long-standing AF and larger left atrial volume. The additional CTI group had a higher incidence of late-onset atrial arrhythmia recurrence (38.6% vs 12.2%; P < .001). When compared to without CTI group, additional CTI therapy did not have a better outcome in terms of freedom of atrial arrhythmia in subgroup analysis. The incidence of early-onset and late-onset atrial arrhythmia recurrence did not differ between additional CTI group and without CTI group in paroxysmal AF patients and nonparoxysmal AF patients after propensity scoring matching. CONCLUSION: CTI block ablation in addition to PVI for AF patients without a history of AFL or inducible AFL during ablation may not improve the clinical outcome of AF ablation in the patients with larger LA volume, nonparoxysmal AF, or post-PVI inducible AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=139). Additional cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) block ablation vs. Without CTI block ablation was evaluated on Late-onset atrial arrhythmia recurrence (p=< .001). Additional cavotricuspid isthmus block ablation did not improve outcomes, with unadjusted late-onset atrial arrhythmia recurrence higher than PVI alone (38.6% vs 12.2%; P<.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: