Randomized trial assesses opioids in patients with use disorder, indicating a novel quantification method.
Despite progress in neurobiological studies with human subjects, sample availability remains a challenge. Urine samples, widely used for screening, suffer from false-positive results due to immunoassay cross-reactivity. Serum, used for confirmatory testing, offers advantages but faces limitations due to blood collection. Microsamples, with a working volume less than 50 μL, present an ideal strategy for robust quantitative data collection in investigations and human laboratory studies. We developed, validated, and automated a serum-based LC-MS/MS assay for accurate quantification of six opioids using only 20 μL of patient samples. Our method, applied in a clinical trial with patients with opioid use disorder (N = 20) receiving intranasal oxytocin, or placebo, for one week in addition to opioid agonist therapy (buprenorphine or methadone). We quantified six different opioids, undetected by urine strip tests, that were used by patients during the treatment phase. Our high-throughput, automated approach surpasses existing methods in literature, enhancing efficiency in multi-matrix studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fariha et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: