Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Over 200 community volunteers who belong to different committees of an alcohol, tobacco, and other drug abuse prevention coalition completed a comprehensive survey designed to measure specific variables associated with coalition functioning including costs and benefits of participation. Community volunteers are one of the coalition's greatest resources, and benefits and costs may mediate member participation throughout the different stages of coalition functioning. The survey was completed first at the formation stage (Time 1), and then eight to ten months later at the implementation stage (Time 2) of the coalition's development. Contrary to most previous research, a principal component analysis of the benefit and cost items yielded only one benefit component and one cost component. Also, the authors found that benefits and costs distinguished between the members of “High” and “Low” attendance groups only at Time 2. We consider the implications for coalition functioning, empowerment theory, and “incentive/cost management.” We also describe how we provided the partnerships with information in order to assist them to implement the incentive/cost management process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chinman et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: