Key result
Nonobstructive CAD linked to ~84% lower annual cardiac death or MI vs obstructive CAD.
Why the study?
Does the presence of normal/near-normal coronary arteries or nonobstructive CAD predict lower rates of cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction compared to obstructive CAD in symptomatic patients referred for nonemergent invasive coronary angiography?
Cohort (n=925)
No
Does the presence of normal/near-normal coronary arteries or nonobstructive CAD predict lower rates of cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction compared to obstructive CAD in symptomatic patients referred for nonemergent invasive coronary angiography?
A high proportion of symptomatic patients referred for nonemergent angiography have nonobstructive disease, which is associated with a very low rate of hard cardiac events compared to obstructive CAD.
Background Normal or near‐normal coronary arteries ( NNCAs ) or nonobstructive coronary artery disease ( CAD) are found on invasive coronary angiography in ≈55% of patients. Some attribute this to frequent referral of low‐risk patients. We sought to identify the referral indications, pretest risk, key clinical characteristics, sex, and outcomes in patients with NNCAs and nonobstructive CAD versus obstructive CAD on nonemergent invasive coronary angiography. Methods and Results Over 24 months, 925 consecutive patients were classified as having NNCAs (≤20% stenosis), nonobstructive CAD (21–49% stenosis), or obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis). Outcomes included cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction , and late revasclarization. NNCAs were found in 285 patients (31.0%), nonobstructive CAD in 125 (13.5%), and obstructive CAD in 513 (55.5%). NNCAs or nonobstructive CAD was found in 40.5% with stress ischemia, 27.9% after a non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction, and in 55.5% with stable or unstable angina. More women than men (53.5% versus 37.2%; P <0.001) had NNCAs or nonobstructive CAD across all referral indications. Pretest risk was high and ICA appropriate in 75.5% and 99.2% of patients, respectively. Annual rates of cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction were 1.0%, 1.1%, and 6.7%, respectively, for patients with NNCAs , nonobstructive CAD , and obstructive CAD ( P <0.001). No sex differences in outcomes were observed with either NNCAs , nonobstructive CAD, or obstructive CAD ( P =0.84). Conclusions Many (44.5%) patients undergoing nonemergent invasive coronary angiography have NNCAs or nonobstructive CAD despite high pretest risk, including ischemia and troponin elevation. Although women had more NNCAs or nonobstructive CAD , there were no differences in event rates by sex. Patients with NNCAs and nonobstructive CAD had very low event rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ouellette et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Suspected coronary artery disease (n=925). Normal/near-normal coronary arteries (≤20% stenosis) or nonobstructive CAD (21-49% stenosis) vs. Obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis) was evaluated on Annual rate of cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (p=<0.001). Patients with normal/near-normal coronary arteries or nonobstructive CAD had significantly lower annual rates of cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction compared to those with obstructive CAD (1.0% and 1.1% vs 6.7%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: