Key result
Moderate HEART scores limit ED clinician willingness to discharge low-risk ADP patients to ~6 of 10.
Why the study?
To evaluate ED clinician perception of patient risk by assessing willingness to discharge patients deemed increased risk by traditional ACS risk stratification but low risk by a validated HST-ADP.
Does clinician perception of risk affect willingness to discharge patients classified as low risk by a high-sensitivity troponin accelerated diagnostic protocol?
Cross-Sectional (n=36)
No
Does clinician perception of risk affect willingness to discharge patients classified as low risk by a high-sensitivity troponin accelerated diagnostic protocol?
ED clinicians exhibit risk aversion when transitioning to a high-sensitivity troponin protocol if traditional risk scores suggest moderate risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinician risk aversion may slow 0-/1-hour HST-ADP adoption when HEART scores conflict; leaves open whether education or integration strategies improve discharge rates.
BACKGROUND: To assess emergency department (ED) clinician perception of patient risk, we measured willingness to discharge patients categorized as increased risk by traditional risk stratification modalities for acute coronary syndrome but low risk by a validated high-sensitivity troponin accelerated diagnostic protocol (HST-ADP). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional descriptive survey study distributed to ED clinicians at an urban academic medical center. Four clinical vignettes classified hypothetical patients as low risk for 30-day acute coronary syndrome according to the 0-/1-hour HST-ADP. Vignettes additionally identified patients with History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk factors, and initial Troponin (HEART) scores of 4 or 6 (2 cases each). One patient in each subset had preexisting coronary artery disease (CAD). ED clinicians self-reported willingness to discharge patients from the ED on a 10-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Among 66 eligible participants, 36 (55%) participated in the survey. ED clinicians reported a mean willingness to discharge patients of 6.07 (95% confidence interval, 5.34-6.80). They reported higher mean willingness to discharge patients with HEART scores of 4 compared with those with HEART scores of 6 (mean difference, 3.61; 95% confidence interval, 2.19-5.03). There were no differences in willingness to discharge regarding presence or absence of CAD or between clinician types (attending, resident, advanced practice provider). CONCLUSIONS: ED clinicians accustomed to the HEART Pathway demonstrated limited willingness to discharge patients from the ED categorized as moderate risk by the HEART score despite simultaneous classification as low risk by the 0-/1-hour HST-ADP. Willingness to discharge was higher with lower HEART scores but not affected by the presence of CAD and did not vary between clinician types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matuskowitz et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Emergency department clinicians (n=36). Clinical vignettes of hypothetical patients with possible ACS was evaluated on Overall level of ED clinician willingness to discharge the patient from the ED on a 10-point Likert scale (95% CI 5.34-6.80). ED clinicians demonstrated limited willingness to discharge patients categorized as moderate risk by the HEART score despite simultaneous classification as low risk by the 0-/1-hour HST-ADP (mean willingness 6.07 on a 10-point scale).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: