Why the study?
Can non-invasive imaging of cardiac electrophysiology (NICE) assess ventricular activation sequences and discriminate pacing vectors in a CRT-D patient?
Can non-invasive imaging of cardiac electrophysiology (NICE) assess ventricular activation sequences and discriminate pacing vectors in a CRT-D patient?
Non-invasive imaging of cardiac electrophysiology can map ventricular activation and discriminate pacing vectors, potentially aiding in LV lead placement and optimization in CRT patients.
AIMS: The present study was aimed to assess epi- and endocardial ventricular electroanatomical activation during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) by means of non-invasive imaging of cardiac electrophysiology (NICE) in a patient with a novel quadripolar LV lead. METHODS AND RESULTS: Non-invasive imaging of cardiac electrophysiology is a novel imaging tool which works by fusing data from high-resolution electrocardiogram (ECG) mapping with a model of the patient's individual cardiothoracic anatomy created from magnetic resonance imaging. This was performed in a cardiac resynchronization therapy defribrillator (CRT-D) patient with a quadripolar left ventricular (LV) lead. Beat-to-beat endocardial and epicardial ventricular activation sequences were computed using NICE during intrinsic conduction as well as during different pacing modes with different LV and biventricular (biV) pacing vectors. The spatial resolution of NICE enabled discrimination of the different pacing vectors during LV and biV pacing. Biventricular pacing resulted in a marked shortening of the total activation duration (TAD) of both ventricles when compared with intrinsic conduction and RV and LV pacing. CONCLUSION: Non-invasive imaging of cardiac electrophysiology facilitates non-invasive imaging of ventricular activation, which may be useful in CRT patients to locate the area of latest ventricular activation as the target area for LV lead placement. Moreover, especially in non-responders to CRT NICE may be further useful to determine the best electrical repositioning option.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seger et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: