This paper examines how China’s dual land system influences rural-to-urban migration through market and government mechanisms. The study finds that active land rental markets promote migration by freeing up economic resources. In contrast, government-led land expropriation tends to discourage migration due to inadequate compensation and institutional barriers, as indicated by the CHARLS data and Probit/Logit models. Key demographic factors—such as income, age, and gender—also play significant roles. These findings highlight the critical impact of land reform policies on urbanization and economic restructuring in China.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiancheng Li (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: