Evaluating the Planning Method in the U.S. Context

This paper examines the strengths and limitations of regulatory planning approaches, particularly traditional zoning methods, in U.S. urban planning. It highlights that zoning provides predictability and stability for developers and decision-makers by specifying land uses, physical requirements for properties, and spatial constraints on development. However, its rigidity may hinder responsiveness to dynamic future development needs and exacerbate issues related to social inclusivity and environmental sustainability. The article also explores efforts to incorporate discretionary elements into U.S. zoning practices to address these challenges, particularly in promoting affordable housing and protecting critical assets.