Why the study?
Heart arrhythmias present diagnostic challenges due to individual variability and the expertise needed for efficient diagnosis, prompting investigation into machine learning to enable rapid, automated detection of sinus bradycardia from ECG samples.
Does a machine learning model accurately detect sinus bradycardia from ECG signals?
Does a machine learning model accurately detect sinus bradycardia from ECG signals?
A K-Nearest Neighbors machine learning model can detect sinus bradycardia from ECG signals with 98% accuracy, demonstrating potential for automated arrhythmia diagnosis.
Supports ML-based sinus bradycardia detection on ECG; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Heart arrhythmias provide challenges for medical professionals due to their unique nature across individuals and the practice required to diagnose efficiently. With the aid of machine learning, however, this process can be improved to the point where diagnosis of a person's heartbeat can be done nearly instantaneously with no human interference. In this paper, I propose a Machine Learning (ML) model that is able to detect the occurrence or absence of sinus bradycardia in an Electrocardiogram (ECG) sample taken from a patient. While performing the standard signal processing pipeline, I evaluate the effectiveness of the features I extract, experimenting with Heart Rate Variability (HRV) metrics. I also test applying Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to the features in order to improve the performance of the ML models. Six models were created, both with and without PCA, with the aid of hyperparameter tuning to maximize accuracy and to ensure the efficient classification of selected data. The best performing model (K-Nearest Neighbors) was able to achieve an accuracy of 98%, precision of 95 %, and F1 Score of 96.7%. My results demonstrate the high potential, especially in clinical applications, in using electrocardiogram signals to diagnose heart arrhythmias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rishi Salvi (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: