Key result
Deep learning using HRV reactivity predicts Internet gaming disorder severity with ~95% accuracy.
Why the study?
Diminished executive control and cue-reactivity play an important role in addiction, and heart rate variability reflects autonomic cognitive-emotional responses. Whether heart rate variability reactivity can classify Internet gaming disorder severity remained to be investigated.
Does a deep learning model using heart rate variability reactivity to gaming cues predict the severity of Internet gaming disorder in male adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=70)
No
Does a deep learning model using heart rate variability reactivity to gaming cues predict the severity of Internet gaming disorder in male adults?
A deep learning model using time-frequency heart rate variability data can accurately classify the severity of Internet gaming disorder based on autonomic reactivity to gaming cues.
May support HRV-based IGD assessment; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Background: The diminished executive control along with cue-reactivity has been suggested to play an important role in addiction. Hear rate variability (HRV), which is related to the autonomic nervous system, is a useful biomarker that can reflect cognitive-emotional responses to stimuli. In this study, Internet gaming disorder (IGD) subjects' autonomic response to gaming-related cues was evaluated by measuring HRV changes in exposure to gaming situation. We investigated whether this HRV reactivity can significantly classify the categorical classification according to the severity of IGD. Methods: The present study included 70 subjects and classified them into 4 classes (normal, mild, moderate and severe) according to their IGD severity. We measured HRV for 5 min after the start of their preferred Internet game to reflect the autonomic response upon exposure to gaming. The neural parameters of deep learning model were trained using time-frequency parameters of HRV. Using the Class Activation Mapping (CAM) algorithm, we analyzed whether the deep learning model could predict the severity classification of IGD and which areas of the time-frequency series were mainly involved. Results: The trained deep learning model showed an accuracy of 95.10% and F-1 scores of 0.995 (normal), 0.994 (mild), 0.995 (moderate), and 0.999 (severe) for the four classes of IGD severity classification. As a result of checking the input of the deep learning model using the CAM algorithm, the high frequency (HF)-HRV was related to the severity classification of IGD. In the case of severe IGD, low frequency (LF)-HRV as well as HF-HRV were identified as regions of interest in the deep learning model. Conclusion: In a deep learning model using the time-frequency HRV data, a significant predictor of IGD severity classification was parasympathetic tone reactivity when exposed to gaming situations. The reactivity of the sympathetic tone for the gaming situation could predict only the severe group of IGD. This study suggests that the autonomic response to the game-related cues can reflect the addiction status to the game.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Internet gaming disorder (n=70). Gaming cues (actual gameplay) vs. Resting state was evaluated on Accuracy of 4-class IGD severity classification. A deep learning model using time-frequency heart rate variability reactivity during gaming cues predicted Internet Gaming Disorder severity classification with an accuracy of 95.10%.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: