Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The response of normal tissues in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy varies, possibly due to genetic differences underlying variation in radiosensitivity. METHODS: Cancer patients (n = 360) were selected retrospectively from the RadGenomics project. Adverse effects within 3 months of radiotherapy completion were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria; high grade group were grade 3 or more (n = 180), low grade group were grade 1 or less (n = 180). Pooled genomic DNA (gDNA) (n = 90 from each group) was screened using 23,244 microsatellites. Markers with different inter-group frequencies (Fisher exact test P < 0.05) were analyzed using the remaining pooled gDNA. Silencing RNA treatment was performed in cultured normal human skin fibroblasts. RESULTS: Forty-seven markers had positive association values; including one in the SEMA3A promoter region (P = 1.24 x 10(-5)). SEMA3A knockdown enhanced radiation resistance. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified 47 putative radiosensitivity markers, and suggested a role for SEMA3A in radiosensitivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michikawa et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: