Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article gives an overview of cross-validation techniques in regression and covariance structure analysis. The method of cross-validation offers a means for checking the accuracy or reliability of results that were obtained by an exploratory analysis of the data. Cross-validation provides the possibility to select, from a set of alternative models, the model with the greatest predictive validity, that is, the model that cross-validates best. The disadvantage of cross-validation is that the data need to be split in two or more parts. This can be a serious problem when sample size is small. Various authors have therefore tried to find single sample criteria that provide the same kind of information as the cross-validation criteria but that do not require the use of a validation sample. Several of these criteria will be discussed, along with some results from studies comparing cross-validation and single sample criteria in covariance structure analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Camstra et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: