PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 17, 2005Family Practice97 citations

Nurse-led adherence support in hypertension: a randomized controlled trial

View Full Paper
KSKnut Schroeder

Key Result

Nurse-led adherence support did not improve medication timing compliance compared with usual care (adjusted difference in means -1.0%; 95% CI -5.1 to 3.1).

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-led adherence support for individuals with uncontrolled hypertension compared to usual care.
  • Randomized controlled trial.
  • 245 participants with uncontrolled hypertension from 21 general practices in Bristol, UK.
  • Participants received either nurse-led adherence support or usual care.
  • No significant difference in timing compliance between intervention (90.8%) and control (94.5%) groups at follow-up.
  • No significant change in systolic blood pressure (-2.7 mmHg; 95% CI -7.2 to 1.8) or diastolic blood pressure (0.2 mmHg; 95% CI -1.9 to 2.3) between groups.
  • Nurse-led support was more expensive per consultation (£6.60) than usual care (£5.08).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=245)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does nurse-led adherence support improve medication adherence and blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension?

P
Population
245 women and men with uncontrolled hypertension (≥150/90 mmHg) recruited from 21 general practices.
I
Intervention
Nurse-led adherence support
C
Comparator
Usual care alone
O
Outcome
Adherence to medication ('timing compliance') and blood pressuresurrogate

Nurse-led adherence support did not improve medication adherence or blood pressure compared to usual care in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, and was associated with higher primary care costs.

Main Result

Mean Difference: -1 (95% CI -5.1–3.1)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lack of medication adherence is a common reason for poor control of blood pressure in the community, increasing the risk of heart attacks and strokes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of nurse-led adherence support for people with uncontrolled high blood pressure compared with usual care. METHODS: We recruited 245 women and men with uncontrolled hypertension (> or = 150/90 mmHg) from 21 general practices in Bristol, UK. Participants were randomized to receive nurse-led adherence support or usual care alone. Main outcome measures were adherence to medication ('timing compliance') and blood pressure. RESULTS: Mean baseline timing compliance (+/- SD) was high in both the intervention (90.8 +/- 15.6%) and the control group (94.5 +/- 7.6%). There was no evidence of an effect of the intervention on timing compliance at follow-up (adjusted difference in means -1.0%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -5.1 to 3.1). There was also no difference at follow-up between the groups with regard to systolic blood pressure (-2.7 mmHg; 95% CI -7.2 to 1.8) or diastolic blood pressure (0.2 mmHg; 95% CI -1.9 to 2.3). Projected costs for the primary care sector per consultation were 6.60 pound sterling for the intervention compared with 5.08 pound sterling for usual care. CONCLUSION: In this study, adherence to blood pressure medication was much higher than previously reported. There was no evidence of an effect of nurse-led adherence support on medication adherence or blood pressure compared with usual care. Nurse-led adherence support was also more expensive from a primary care perspective.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Knut Schroeder (2005) conducted an RCT in Uncontrolled hypertension (n=245). Nurse-led adherence support vs. Usual care was evaluated on Adherence to medication ('timing compliance') (MD -1.0%, 95% CI -5.1 to 3.1). Nurse-led adherence support did not improve medication timing compliance compared with usual care (adjusted difference in means -1.0%; 95% CI -5.1 to 3.1).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ff97a0a77fb36002e5901https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmh717
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper