Key result
Long-term angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy in chronic atrial fibrillation significantly prolonged mean fibrillation cycle length from 154 ms to 187 ms (p=0.005), unlike non-ARB therapy.
Why the study?
Does long-term ARB therapy prolong fibrillation cycle length in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=25)
Does long-term ARB therapy prolong fibrillation cycle length in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 187% vs 149%
p-value: p=0.005
Long-term ARB therapy over 6 years is associated with a significant prolongation of the fibrillation cycle length in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.
Does not support changing ARB use in chronic AF; leaves open anti-remodeling effects pending randomized outcome trials.
Introduction The long‐term effect of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) on atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear. In this study, we evaluated the change in the fibrillation cycle length (FCL) in patients under long‐term ARB therapy for chronic AF. Methods and results The study population consisted of 25 chronic AF patients who were prescribed the same medication for more than 6 years and in whom specific ECG recording for FCL evaluation could be performed before and after the 6‐year observation period. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those with and without ARB (ARB group and non‐ARB group and n =15 and 10, respectively). FCL was calculated by the spectral analysis of the fibrillation waves in the surface ECG. There was no significant difference in the clinical characteristics between the 2 groups. In the ARB group, the mean FCL was prolonged from 154±20 ms to 187±37 ms ( p =0.005), whereas it remained unchanged in the non‐ARB group (150±12 ms vs. 149±10 ms). In the comparison between patients with and those without FCL prolongation (>30 ms; n =6 and 19, respectively), a significant difference was observed only in those prescribed ARBs. Conclusion In cases of chronic AF, FCL might be prolonged under long‐term ARB treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kishihara et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Chronic atrial fibrillation (n=25). Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) vs. Non-ARB therapy was evaluated on Change in fibrillation cycle length (FCL) (p=0.005). Long-term angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy in chronic atrial fibrillation significantly prolonged mean fibrillation cycle length from 154 ms to 187 ms (p=0.005), unlike non-ARB therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: